First they'll lobby. If that fails, they'll sue. They'll have all kinds of bullshit reasons why this is necessary for growth, investment and infrastructure.
They have better access to legislators and regulators, as well as more sympathetic ears in the government due to having, for lack of a better term, monopoly money to throw around.
It's frustrating to say the least.
It might be the result of some local regulatory deal they have made to become a monopoly, but it isn't the result of FCC's net neutrality regulation.
Have you ever looked around the world and found a nation that has no regulations at all, or nearly so, that you want to live in? There are still places that are wild west like. Aren't really teeming with VC or good internet though.
Where do you people get this fantasy?
So, now rather than simply saying less you have to defend what's specifically wrong with each regulation as there are some you want to keep.
All you have to do is get rid of all the bad regulations, while keeping all the good regulations. Boom, issue resolved.