Courts would consider it an overreach, and that specific clause would be nullified.
You can't take everything from another party while offering no compensation and expect a court to uphold it.
EDIT: Disclaimer: Not a lawyer. Not your lawyer.
Courts would consider it an overreach, and that specific clause would be nullified.
You can't take everything from another party while offering no compensation and expect a court to uphold it.
EDIT: Disclaimer: Not a lawyer. Not your lawyer.
> It’s also worth noting that in agreeing to the company’s T&Cs Tinder users grant it a “worldwide, transferable, sub-licensable, royalty-free, right and license to host, store, use, copy, display, reproduce, adapt, edit, publish, modify and distribute” their content — though it’s less clear whether that would apply in this case where a third-party developer is scraping Tinder data and releasing it under a public domain license.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consideration
https://nationalparalegal.edu/public_documents/courseware_as...
"The idea of consideration is vital to contract law because, in order for a contract to be enforceable, there must be “mutuality of obligation.” In other words, in order for a contract to be valid, both parties to the contract must be required to perform under the contract. Consideration, which represents the commitment that the parties to the contract make to each other, is at the heart of the “mutuality of obligation” rule and, therefore, without consideration, a contract will not be enforceable."