Colleges Think Women Having Sex Is Dangerous. Laura Kipnis Says They’re Wrong
reason.com
reason.com
A few years later, at a southern state university, I had the experience of having my driver's license taken by the RA before I could visit with a friend in her women-only dorm room. It was like the rest of the world was a man library, and my card was being filed away like a book in a 1980's library.
Sounds like that theoretically would not happen today -- but I have a hard time believing that's the case.
Is it sexual harassment when someone gets someone to have sex with them by taking advantage of another's vulnerable state, or giving false promises, or has un-consented anal or other sex acts when only vaginal sex is consented to. How clear does a woman have to express lack of consent when in the heat of the moment?
These are not questions with easy answers and their inherent vagueness encourages jilted women to make these claims, horny men to act in ways that encourage these claims, and leaves administrators and officials straining to effectively and fairly evaluate these claims.
The way Western culture and Western sexuality and the expectations surrounding it are set up is pretty much geared for these sorts of sexual harassment cases to come up.
The unconsented acts would not be harassment, they would be assault.
Funny how paternalist is pejorative, when mothers can be just as controlling, especially about sex.
I can't imagine what hard forking or a 51% attack would do to the "community."
Diaspora?
These apps are pointless because, legally speaking, sex is actually not contractual (& prostitution is illegal, so no contract enforcement there either). People can, do, and are legally permitted to change their minds about what they do and do not consent to during the course of sexual activity. We may agree to sex, but we all can change our minds at any time for any reason. No matter how we felt 10 minutes ago, we are all allowed to decide actually we don't feel like it, your sheets are too gross or what one partner thought was sexy, the other thought was demeaning, or whatever--no matter what we agreed on beforehand.
TLDR: evidence of prior consent is not a trump card.