Isn't that kind of obvious given that it is 110M years old or did you interpret this as potential dino-burger material?
Intact for a 110M year old fossil means just that, it does not mean that the tissue has not been fossilized, it means it has not decomposed as it normally would.
If soft tissue and skin follow their normal path all you'd have is bones. Intact here means that the material is still present, but in fossilized form (just like fossilized bones are no longer the same as real bones).
The 'intact' is very much important here because that means it is not just fragments.