Hacker News Reader

As "fair" != free/gratis, I assume this is just a price discussion between Intel/Samsung and Qualcomm. So what is interpreted as "fair" for Qualcomm, it is not for Intel/Samsung. Result: if the FRAND limitation doesn't set explicit margins, this is going to get ugly for Samsung and Intel.

View on HN

No, FRAND means that the licensing terms are fixed, equal and open to all and cannot be used to gain a competitive advantage.

Then, who is right, Qualcomm saying they're honoring the agreements, or Intel/Samsung? Both can not be right.

Qualcomm is most likely wrong and has been found guilty in at least three different courts. The FTC has been a bit slow in keeping up with other regulators. Qualcomm does have quite a bit of political and lobbying clout in the US -- ie, Qualcomm is a domestic company whereas most device makers are foreign.

That's what the lawsuit is to determine.

I'm guessing Qualcomm will lose.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com