>
Sure. That's why they specified ...some startup multi-millionaire/billionaire ... Because money is not relevant to their point.Yes, "sure".
My argument was clear enough, and as the parent wrote "it's not about money or class, it's about success in a particular field and judgement of that particular field". What part of either seems difficult to parse?
Obviously money is relevant to my point in so much as it serves as the proof of that startup/unicorn success. The idea, and it's bizarro that I have to state it again, is rather that if you're to sneer at somebody for not "making it big" with their business, it only makes sense if you do it while yourself having a bigger business.
That's why I wrote millionaire/billionaire, not because I hold millionaires/billionaires in high esteem, or find it OK for them to look down on people.
I just find it more logical for a more succesful in business person to sneer at a less succesful in business regarding the latters business success, than the opposite.