Also, if it's not that, where does that aspect come from then? How long have archeologists been doing this?
Doing what? Making assumptions and jumping to conclusions? That's a good question and I don't know the answer. How long have you been doing it?
Defaulting anything they should ordinary label as "purpose unknown" to "religious".
> How long have you been doing it?
Claiming that i am jumping to conclusions is ridiculous. I started the first post by saying i already thought my initial thought may have been doing that, and stated it as a feeling (subjective), and thus positioned it not as an objective fact but a hypothesis, inviting discussion. I was earnest, honest and clear. You're just being gracelessly sarcastic and dishonest.
And i think you're right about archeology. Most of the notable people mentioned in the history section of wikipedia are english.