Some people get disillusioned at this fact, thinking RDS was something more magical. But AWS does offer the Multi-AZ option, which does the maintenance on the standby, fails over, and then performs the same on the main instance. It's effectively transparent. RDS also makes backups, restores (including point in time), encryption using KMS etc. really easy. If you don't have a full-time DBA, RDS provides for a very easy to use DB with virtually no maintenance required, but Multi-AZ is absolutely required for any kind of production deployment.
AWS's answer to Cloud Spanner is much more likely to be a future cross-region replicating version of DynamoDB or Aurora, not RDS.
I'm sure there's scenarios where it's worked well for people, but I've never seen it happen.
Define "maintenance window" - the DB becomes read-only? Or unreachable? This sounds insane to me.
If you're running anything production-worthy, you'll be using one of AWS's multi-AZ/failover solutions for your production RDS instances. In that case, the database will perform a failover in those instances so there isn't downtime.
Have you done that? I have and there's been downtime every time (~5m).
At our shop, we haven't had any problems with RDS maintenance at all -- and we would indeed get paged for even 1 minute of database downtime, much less 20 (!). That said, we don't have that sort of monitoring in place for any of the test/staging DBs (which are not multi-AZ).
insert mind expanding gif
* How precisely is it measured? * What happens if it is not met?
As observed by the other posters, scheduled maintenance doesn't count.