Also, how do they ensure that their systems are no longer compromised?
Also, how do they ensure that their systems are no longer compromised?
- an engineer stumbled upon clear evidence of a rootkit, like a leftover dotfile or shell history entries
- the exfiltrated data got used and someone noticed
(Different story for active intrusions, where the intruder is detected when they first breach a system. At least anecdotally, the passive after-the-fact detection above seems more common, though.)
I assume many startups use AWS or GCE (with auto scaling) and thus don't necessarily setup/SSH into each and every machine/VM. Wouldn't this make rootkit detection more difficult?
edit: how would an active intrusion detection take place?
[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rkhunter
[2] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chkrootkit
[3] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Host-based_intrusion_detection...
They're good for checking old backups to see if you were hacked in the 90s, not so useful for today.
It takes a good amount of setup because there are a lot of files that routinely change that you will want to ignore.
https://blog.lastpass.com/2015/06/lastpass-security-notice.h...