Intelligence Contractor Is Charged in First Leak Case Under Trump

First they claim electronic voting is safe, then they keep secret incidents which might make the public think otherwise.

Ensuring the public gets a secure voting method (paper) is much more important than catching who did it. And I'm far from confident this incident would have eventually been made public.

Wait what? It corroborates rather than undermines any investigation into what went on during the election process. Anyone in the NSA reading about this (i.e. everyone in the NSA) will now have all the more reason to step forward if they really care about the truth.

> Did she think this information would not reach the public for some reason?

Considering Trump ostensibly, and in his own words, fired Comey for not bringing the investigation into the "Russian" connection[0] to a swift end and that there was a possibility that he could have prevented Comey from testifying, it's pretty reasonable to assume she was acting under he assumption that this information may never see the light of day.

I do feel some pity for her as her prosecution and likely sentencing will not only serve as a warning for future leakers (just another highly flawed judicial concept in the American "justice" system), it will likely be handled in some capacity by Jeff Sessions, a paleolithic scumbag who sees our incarceration rates and prison environments as a feature, not a bug.

[0] http://bigthink.com/videos/jordan-greenhall-how-russias-elec... -Short, yet fascinating talk about the evolution, structure and operation of modern day propaganda

I just read the comments and I thought you were lying about the name but turns out it is her real name.