Maybe you would like to address the substance of the comment, otherwise your only argument is "you are arguing and you shouldn't".

Sure it's interesting in a certain sense, but is it problematic? The whole point of these sorts of incidents being publicised is to make an argument that men in STEM as a group treat women in STEM as a group unfairly and therefore intervention to improve the lot of the latter at the expense of the former is an ethical necessity. To insinuate, as you seem to be doing, that members of the former group stepping up to contest the case against them is further evidence of its validity is downright kafkaesque.

Alternatively, every time a a man is rude to a woman, there are volunteers eager to show it's sexism.