I would expect to see some kind of police report, and prosecution of an individual charged with a crime, no?
If there isn't a police report, and charges aren't pressed against a malicious individual, then the company may be at fault.
Certainly the employee could willingly and pro-actively step down, out of personal guilt and feelings of shame, but then, one need not qualify with "ex" as simply "employee" will suffice. A criminal incident is worthy of such a clarification, indicating that the incident is a deliberate attack, but human error is not.
What if the admin was a remote worker in a country that doesn't have an extradition treaty with the Netherlands (Verelox hq country)?
> 4 low-latency locations in ISO/IEC 27001
> certified Tier 3+ data centers in United
> States, Netherlands, France and Canada.
If this was a "cyber crime" they could possibly be picked up to stand trial in any cooperating country which would narrow their choices of travel.
However, in that situation they would probably be fine except potentially limited ability to work for Companies who do background checks
Although that's perhaps not the right word. There is contiguous land between e.g. The Netherlands and Russia, so there's no "shore" involved as there would be between e.g. the USA and Russia. I do think the word's meaning is now more "another country", rather than denoting crossing physical land/water boundaries.
Maybe in North Korea, or the US. Relatively unlikely in civilized countries.
I've been following and partaking in various European cybercrime trials for years and unless this guy is a repeat offender or acted in a particularly methodical manner it seems utterly ridiculous to make blanket statements like "this guy will go to jail". He most likely will not.
Compare US incarceration rate of 693 people per 100,000 to 69 people per 100,000 in the Netherlands.