It is also clearly not the responsibility of white men to give positive experiences to PoC and women, because they can't be expected to understand how if they aren't first given positive experiences by PoC and women.
It is also clearly not the responsibility of white men to give positive experiences to PoC and women, because they can't be expected to understand how if they aren't first given positive experiences by PoC and women.
If your goal is to feel self-righteous and superior, by all means attack those who are showing genuine interest in coming over to your side. If your goal is to actually bring about a positive change in society, perhaps it's worthwhile to consider a different approach.
How are they 'showing' this exactly? What makes it 'genuine' that they want to come over to another side? Why are they on a 'side' in the first place, and what makes you think that the goal is to have them change 'sides'? Are you saying they are not already on 'our side'? What does that imply? How can you distinguish their arguments from those of people who simply want to argue their position and remain ignorant?
You imply that while men can do nothing for themselves unless given positive experiences by women an PoC.
This is obviously false, since there are plenty of white men who have a good understanding of these issues.
Stop blaming women and PoC for your own ignorance and go and learn something from people who have figured this stuff out.
So thank you for helping me to demonstrate to everyone else in this thread that speaking from anger, constructing and attacking the flimsiest of straw men, and repeatedly misconstruing a sympathetic counterparty's points only serves to push away the people you might hope to see your point of view.
I genuinely hope it was satisfying for you, because that's about the only positive outcome that's likely to arise for you out of this.
Also - there is nothing you have said that indicates you are a sympathetic counterparty. How do you expect us to know that? Therein lies the problem.