What experiment can you perform to decide if a moral system is superior to another?
>In the moral system
What is your point? Are you listing examples where you expect me to sympathize with you and therefore agree? How does my own sympathy for your position prove that those moral systems are inferior to others? What does that even mean?
>But the moment you want to oppress my freedom, for the sake of your self-interest, I say fuck you self-interest.
Yes, and we say fuck what you think is your freedom, except we're powerful enough to actually get what we want.
>I don't need to convince you of anything. Why?
Because it sounds like you want us to change the way we're behaving, and you don't have the physical power to make us. Moral arguments will work on people that are already sympathetic to you, and people whose interests are pretty well aligned with what your moral system prescribes. They don't work so well on people whose interests would be seriously harmed by following them.
>Your same repugnant
I'll save you some time typing: I don't care if you call me repugnant. I don't care if you call me the worst names out there. It's not an argument. It's not going to convince me of anything except that you don't have an argument.
>self-interest argument was used by slave owners
Yes, it was, and so they did it until someone more powerful made them stop.
>You have no right to dictate to me that I can only associate with you
I don't care if your moral system says I do or don't have a right to dictate such to you.
>I should be free to hire any one from any country as I see fit.
That's your opinion, not an argument.
>Immigration restrictions are oppressive and immoral
Oppressive? I guess you could make an argument like that if you defined oppressive in a certain way. Either way, I think they're in my interest. Immoral? That's a matter of opinion.
>If I started a company, and made large amounts of money, and you decided to play video games and watch Netflix all day long while I toiled day and night, then you have no fucking moral right to live on money stolen by taxing the income of hard-working people like myself.
Another matter of opinion.
>Frankly, I am under no obligation to convince you that you should not oppress my freedom, and threaten me with violence, to further your self-interest.
The only obligation would be a self-imposed one. If you want very badly to get what you want, and are not powerful enough to make it so, then you have no choice but to convince those that are powerful enough. That's reality.
>I believe in absolute objective morality.
What is an example of a hypothesis that you can test to determine if something is absolutely objectively moral? How can you test it? What useful information can I get out of such a test? Can I use the result to make a prediction, like in science?
>I don't think there are multiple "fair/just" moral frameworks.
There are certainly multiple moral frameworks. They mostly consider the others unjust in various ways.
>Try to live without violating the rights and freedoms of the others.
Why should I choose to honor the rights and freedoms which are specified by your moral system rather than the rights and freedoms specified by some other arbitrarily chosen moral system?