It was more about not wanting to rot in US prison, I think.
It was more about not wanting to rot in US prison, I think.
That seems a perfectly rational decision to me.
People were dropping out of Wikileaks 10 years ago because of Assange's behaviour. Seems like Poitras is just the latest in a long line of people who are attracted to the principles of Wikileaks, but turned off by the reality.
Sources? Because this is the exact opposite of what I read: that Swedish investigators had repeatedly refused to interview him there.
Edit: I googled and I'm still convinced I'm right: https://www.google.com/search?q=why+dont+swedish+police+inte...
Edit2: unless someone can show sources moomins answer I'll say it is wrong and dangerously wrong in that it spreads a lie.
I still can't understand why no-one has bother to either downvote it or provide sources for it.
I don't necessarily like Assange but lets not lie to create more trouble for him.
1 http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/julian-assange-poli...
2 http://www.reuters.com/article/us-ecuador-sweden-assange-idU...
3 http://www.smh.com.au/world/swedish-prosecutor-ingrid-isgren...
4 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assange_v_Swedish_Prosecution_...
It was them who repeatedly refused to meet him. He offered to meet them repeatedly.
I do, on the other hand, wonder why he'd consider Sweden a greater risk than the UK.