Hacker News Reader

HNHacker News

Top New Best Ask Show Jobs

Comment by Aaronontheweb | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

Aaronontheweb·

I think Facebook is vastly overestimating the number of people who are actually going to go out and "like" stuff.

View on HN

The effort of Liking is easily an order of magnitude less than creating a link, which is what (nominally) Google uses.

And I'd SWAG that an order of magnitude more people are capable of Liking than are even able to create a new link.

The effort to implement a like button on a site is an order of magnitude more difficult than implementing a link.

Actually, it's not. Instead of an a tag, it's an iframe where the link is passed in as a parameter.

It took me approximately 90 seconds to implement from looking at the docs to deploy to one of my sites.

Technically 90 seconds is an order of magnitude more difficult than making a regular link. Not a huge hurdle, but I don't need to read any docs or go fetch embed code to make a link.

... I guess it's also because I'm using Rails, so I'm already generating links via a helper function. So I wrote another, one line helper that does the wrapping. So that initial 90 seconds is amortized over every new Like button I add, because I use like_url rather than link_to.

Also, often like buttons are used on something like stories, so you're only adding the code to one template, and now you have tons of like buttons all over.

I chose to go the other route which takes even longer. Load the XFBML version, and include the open graph meta tags.

I did the same thing that you did, wrapped it all in a like_url helper.

That and if my friends likes are valuable to me. Considering my having to ban Farmville and the like I'm pretty sure I don't want my social graph having anything to do with my search results.

I don't know, man. The NHL, for example, has seen tons of engagement related to liking things. http://scobleizer.com/2010/04/22/facebook-ambition/

Reply on news.ycombinator.com