> Of course, in the jurisdictions that allow it, could be modified for cannabis as well.
I suspect this is the actual reasoning and target product.
Unfortunately, you can't get funding for that legally in most jurisdictions.
I suspect this is the actual reasoning and target product.
Unfortunately, you can't get funding for that legally in most jurisdictions.
But republicans are still moralizing christians that wish to force their ideals upon others. Because if anything's been shown, cannabis is one hell of a tax generator and mucho underutilized commerce. But aside this illegal usage in most jurisdictions, this could suffice growing in bad environments or to people with way too much money to spend.
There could be a different segment; people who want guaranteed food supply. And locally, this could make food safety a guarantee. I could also see this as a non-profit as well, with low income and homeless getting free access.
No it doesn't.
If a farm has a bad harvest, there are other farms a store can buy from. If the store has a bad harvest. They're competing with their own customers to buy food from the next store over.