https://krebsonsecurity.com/2017/01/who-is-anna-senpai-the-m...
Previous discussions:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13435742
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13428824
Supposed Reddit comment from the author: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/5nqq3c/serious_p...
I personally feel that it is. (maybe tis was already obvious to others - I just havent talked about it out oud to anyone prior...)
Well,now... there's my problem right there... Jus' don' know much 'bout them japanese now doncha.
<rocks back and forth with thumbs on the straps of my filthy coveralls, spits...>
Yep yep yep is what I always say...
<heads back into dilapidated datacenter behind squeaky screen door only holding on by one hinge>
Every single thread of this nature has a similar comment, and I really want to know (ie, I want to hear this fully fleshed out because I think your concerns are valid and worth exploring): is this demonstrative of a new (or in some way more valid) notion of the word "hacker" in "hacker news?"
My sense of that word, and of the culture that underlying it, is that a critical part of its critique is that obscurity, specifically in its implications for security (and thus, perhaps civility and peace and justice), is subject to deprecation in the information age, precisely in favor of styles of disclosure like this: where the pudding for the tasting is provided as the proof.
Have I missed something very important?
Are there good reasons to believe that obscurity (ie, keeping secret the means and methods of attack) is likely to be a viable defense in favor of civility and justice in the age to come?
I meant to reply to this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14660862
Sorry about the confusion.