> Given that Mozilla has their own extensive CI infrastructure
While Mozilla does sponsor a lot of Rust stuff, it's fundamentally a community project, and so many of us (including myself) would prefer to not to move closer to something that's Mozilla-specific.
Fundamentally the problem with CI testing on Mac is that Apple don't provide the components you want to build a large pool of machines at reasonable cost, so everyone ends up doing slightly mad things involving hundreds of mac minis (obviously the Windows situation also isn't great; this kind of infrastructure loves free software on commodity hardware).
> We are already paying Travis.
Have you heard anything from them about improving the issues with macOS? You've certainly got a case study in it being a problem.
> While Mozilla does sponsor a lot of Rust stuff, it's fundamentally a community project, and so many of us (including myself) would prefer to not to move closer to something that's Mozilla-specific.
Fair enough; I only suggested it because I had the impression that Mozilla's bits were all based on Open Source systems, and it would just be a matter of sharing hosting infrastructure rather than duplicating it.
Yeah, it's not really so much "it's not open source" as it is "Mozilla is the only organization who's really using this stuff". I used to worry about this a lot, but I think we've mostly gotten away from it now that a lot of organizations are using Rust. That is, if Rust was a Mozilla-only technology, I think Rust would have failed its mission. As such, I'm wary of things that seemingly tie Rust back into Mozilla too specifically.
We wanted to pay them (as an OSS project) for faster and more reliable builds for a long time but they always refused.