Then maybe instead of calling math fancy arithmetic, we should call arithmetic "hard math"? :P
Seems like you agree more than disagree; math and arithmetic aren't easily separable, if you're being serious instead of cheeky?
Seems like you agree more than disagree; math and arithmetic aren't easily separable, if you're being serious instead of cheeky?
1) Arithmetic (number theory) is far harder than most people realise, to the point that its considered one of the most complicated mathematical disciplines.
2) Most subject areas in math bear little to no resemblance to arithmetic, so it doesn't make sense to call all math 'Fancy Arithmetic'.
But I'm not actually proposing that, just sharing a cheeky point of view to contrast @taneq's boss, so don't take me too seriously. ;)
I am a newb at this stuff, but I believe (basic) number theory actually builds on recursive structures, and then uses induction to make statements about behavior.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peano_axioms#Addition
What is interesting is how the same approach works for analogous structures like lists - because of the monoid abstraction.
But that said, I didn't learn addition in terms of monoids, and I don't know anyone else who did. This might be a grand unified theory of math under which addition fits, but physical addition has no recursive monoid analogue. You can add two weights together to get a measurable sum, and it does not depend on a recursive structure that uses induction. You just put two separate things side by side on the scale.
Just because we can explain addition using monoids and induction does not mean that addition is made of monoids and induction.
Also, I probably wouldn't use Peano theory as the starting place to teach addition. As a pedagogical tool, this is advanced math, and I guess would be a bigger impediment to learning than Greek symbols, for beginners. Right?