A dichotomy:
- executive power should be wielded (WITH | WITHOUT) input from leaders of the economy
I'm not arguing that we should elect Trump. It's done. Now that he wields exec power, you think that "WITHOUT" is the better choice above? Why?
- executive power should be wielded (WITH | WITHOUT) input from leaders of the economy
I'm not arguing that we should elect Trump. It's done. Now that he wields exec power, you think that "WITHOUT" is the better choice above? Why?
> - executive power should be wielded (WITH | WITHOUT) input from leaders of the economy
That's not anything remotely like a syllogism; it's just a dichotomy.
A syllogism is a structured argument consisting of a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion that follows from the two premises.
A more relevant question is whether it's worth it for leaders of the industry to publicly pretend to give input to a person who they know will ignore it.