That's not really fair. The data should speak for itself, and I for one found the argument cogent. Did you find any errors or bias?
Otherwise you might as well say the CDC saying something about Disease is invalid.
Otherwise you might as well say the CDC saying something about Disease is invalid.
"Innovation" is a bit more nebulous, and the EIG appears to be quasi-non-profit, but is a private company.
Also, parent comment said "skeptical", not "invalid".