> why's everyone so harsh on Watson?
well we're talking a _cognitive_ platform that requires 60M$ of _manual_ tuning before it's useful, am I the only one that finds that weird?
well we're talking a _cognitive_ platform that requires 60M$ of _manual_ tuning before it's useful, am I the only one that finds that weird?
Pedantic but important - the final product wasn't usable even after spending an obscene amount of money customizing it to the task