Cryptocurrency doesn't even register as a drop in the metaphorical bucket.
It makes sense to spend a few hundred megawatts on a system that created thousands of jobs.
Overall, Bitcoin reduces friction, enables transactions that would not otherwise take place, and protects people from losing their cash/savings in various situations. Here are just a few examples of problems of the existing financial system that Bitcoin solves:
- Credit card being denied while in a foreign country because the system accidentally tagged it as fraudulent
- Merchants unable to sell online and accept credit cards due to their market segment encountering high CC fraud
- Person unable to quickly and cheaply send remittance to family in foreign country
- Countries confiscating savings accounts of citizens (eg. Cyprus in 2014)
- Countries running their currency to the ground (Venezuela in 2017, Zimbabwe hyperinflation, USSR collapse, etc)
- DEA stealing innocent people carrying cash thanks to civil forfeiture laws (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/07/dea-asset-forfeitur... http://priceonomics.com/how-police-officers-seize-cash-from-...)
- Bitcoin helping Chinese bypass GFW censorship (https://www.larrysalibra.com/hop-over-the-great-firewall-wit...)
- Paypal freezing for months the account of someone asking for donations for an expensive medical treatment (quite a few news stories about similar situations)
I could go on and on.
The difference between regular money and crypto money is that the upkeep of the former is mostly tied to physical reality and doesn't influence the value of money itself. In case of the latter, however, all that energy waste is a) completely arbitrary, and b) directly tied into the value of money (the more power you burn, the more you earn, and one party burning hard means other have to do as well, for the blockchain to stay secure).
Or in TL;DR: cryptocurrencies directly incentivize wasting energy. Regular money does not.