Linkarchiver, a new bot to back up tweeted links
parkerhiggins.net
parkerhiggins.net
I would recommend contributing to their various tools[3] so that the archive can be maintained for future digital archeologists.
The Wayback Machine is run by the Internet Archive (and ArchiveTeam is a project run in part by folks from the Internet Archive and a whole gaggle of volunteers), so I'm not really surprised they were happy with you providing backups of URL shortened links. But I would recommend helping URLTeam more directly (since their method of keeping archives of URL shorteners is much more efficient).
[1]: http://urlte.am/ [2]: https://thepiratebay.org/torrent/5923737/Geocities_-_The_Tor... [3]: https://github.com/ArchiveTeam/terroroftinytown
Instead, it backs up the contents of the pages that are linked to at the time of the tweets. Frankly my tool doesn't do anything interesting at all with the URLs — it just submits the "expanded URL" that was tweeted to the Wayback Machine and lets it sort out any and all 301s.
But yeah, if you want to bypass t.co (meaning that it's not useful for archeologists) it makes sense to just archive them.
(1) the tweet-detail page, for the tweet that includes the link;
(2) the t.co mapping, so that the tweet-detail page's t.co link can somehow be resolved to the (archived) page to which it links.
I don't think there are any blocks against doing (1).
Unfortunately for (2), Twitter has a blanket robots.txt prohibition in place for domain t.co. Perhaps IA could be convinced to ignore that robots.txt in the public interest.
Alternatively, perhaps another site could be set up that itself accepts t.co link-paths, in the background queries t.co, and returns both an HTML page and working redirect that isn't robots.txt-blocked. LinkArchiver (and any other similar sites) could as a convention archive responses of this other site whenever they'd like to archive t.co.
Agreed on the relative dearth of well-gisted tutorial content re: routine sysadmin tasks.
Outlets that pump out tons of marginally-differentiable content on <today's unnecessary stack element that'll have you terraforming the noosphere 333% more, free> tend to prevail by sheer numbers.
That being said, systemd is its own problem in need of abstracting away from. Supervisor⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾ might be the layer you're looking for.
____________________
¹ http://supervisord.org/index.html
² https://digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-install-...