Hacker News Reader

Comment by athenot | Hacker News Reader

Meanwhile LinkedIn was happy to scrape its users' email archives and contact lists. It would appear there's some karma at play here...

View on HN

Seriously, they made it seems like I'm connecting with my contacts that have linkedin account already.

It turns out I was spamming my friends to get on linkedin because of them.

This was in the early days of Linkedin. That was such a douchey move, even if there was a warning their UI and stuff enable it easy to mass spam your contact list with 1-2 clicks.

That is an interesting fact.. LinkedIn broke the ruling against scraping they are relying on to prevent scraping.

Scraping would be forbidden via TOS; theoretically it would be the users giving access to linked in (who actually is bound by the terms) who would be liable, not linked in.

That still wouldn't prevent an entity (person or corporation) that never agreed to the TOS from scraping.

If it's illegal to scrape without permission, that makes the behavior of scraping illegal. They are not claiming it's a TOS violation, they're claiming it's a CFAA violation, which is a federal statue and (theoretically) applies equally to everyone.

My point is that someone with permission gave them access.

Having "permission" is not an applicable defense to a federal criminal charge, the law supersedes some random person (i.e. a LinkedIn user) saying "oh yeah, that's okay."

Reply on news.ycombinator.com