Why is Ubuntu not suited to production?
I keep hearing it but it's starting to sound like Red Hat marketing like Macs don't get viruses.
I keep hearing it but it's starting to sound like Red Hat marketing like Macs don't get viruses.
A non-LTS Ubuntu release should be avoided, since they tend to be less stable.
If you're using something in the Debian family, Debian itself is probably the much better choice unless you're looking to use Canonical's enterprise products.
- Ubuntu is not stable
- it is not hardened out of the box
- it can contain dangerous configuration out of the box
- it calls home
- it will tempt you to install dev packages or other packages unfit for production (because devs dev on ubuntu and they require the dev packages)
But please, don't mind me. Other people are better at explaining this. I'm biassed.