> I wouldn't jump to conclusions just because you find such outliers. Some weird mechanisms might be driving such numbers
[1] The beauty of your vagueness is that it allows someone to inject whatever they believe is the "real cause" of the problem in the United States, perfectly allowing them to project their own bias upon your post as well. It also makes it difficult for someone else to counter it since they're not entirely sure what you're trying to say at all. An intriguing approach I must say.
All of them in it for the love of science and engineering.