Ways of Looking at Frank Lloyd Wright
nybooks.com
nybooks.com
The large drawings of the Illinois/Mile High Skyscraper are certainly worth seeing in person, as are models of the Monona Terrace and the Guggenheim.
Wasn't it MoMA's very own Nazi loving Philip Johnson [1] that lead the way to relegate (hah) FLW as a has been and push the "International Style" via the cultural propaganda organ of MoMA?
[1]: https://paleofuture.gizmodo.com/one-of-americas-most-famous-...
Historically, it's worth noting that the decade preceding The International Style at MoMA was not a particularly high point of Wright's career. Partially because of the personal drama he created led to limited commissions. Partially because his architectural vision was mostly manifested in textile block structures. His most interesting earlier works were twenty years old and his most interesting later works were a few years down the road.
None of which is to defend Johnson. I'm not a fan of Van der Rohe either. He led the Bauhaus after the Nazi's kicked out Gropius (of whom I am a fan). The other connection between Johnson and Van der Rohe is both built glass houses. Johnson first and lived in it, Van der Rohe did a knockoff for a client a few years later.
Anyway the political affiliations of architects is always problematic, e.g. Imhotep or Vitruvius or anyone I've ever heard of from the Italian Renaissance. Heck, HOK designed Enron Field.