Don't get me wrong, the rhetorical trick that idlewords is implied to use is just as annoying. Like,
"If pro-life people truly cared about human and babies lives, why don't they speak up for single-payer healthcare?" It involves irrational assumptions and/or over-simplification of issues. And its implications are itself a logical fallacy:
If people who support A also support B, and people who support C support B, then people who believe in A but not C are hypocritesBut No True Scotsman fallacies can occur without those pre-requisites and it's a common enough fallacy that it deserves its own term, so that it's easier to identify and denounce its use.
Also, I really want to know if there is a specific phrase/category that describes what idlewords is accused of, for the same reasons of easier identification and denunciation :)