I'm more disappointed that it's 2010 and people are still talking about Climategate on HN.
You're disappointed that someone posted a followup article to something that received a lot of attention? On the contrary, that's exactly what I like to see (although perhaps not this particular spin). Followups may not be as interesting as the original debacles, but they are more informative.
No, they're pushing, "there's no conclusive proof that climate change is driven primarily by human activity." There are plenty of papers written on climate change and lots of evidence for it ... Ice Age evidence, glacier growth and receding, etc,...