> I honestly wished you made better backup points to your arguments. I'm left with nothing to go on as it is now.
I don't need to, you either understand evolution or you don't; it's not an opinion to be argued, it is how the world works. There's nothing you can refute, any refutation is simply evidence you do not understand the facts of reality. You can't argue with someone who denies evolution, their mind doesn't value facts.
> Nature by my reasoning is magical though.
Then your reasoning is flawed. Magic is that which breaks the rules of nature, like your god for example. Nature is not magical, the natural world is the very definition of not magic.
> Simple rules fail in the subject of the Heisenberg principle.
You don't understand evolution, you're nowhere near ready to approach the topic of quantum mechanics.