Please tell me that nodejs didn't just have a vote on removing a member because the said member shared an article which was critical of speech codes and implied CoCs can have downsides. And 40% voted for removal. Please tell me it was something more serious and controversial. Because if that's what we arrived at - that the mere implication that you might not be 100% devoted to the orthodoxy, that you might be considering committing a thoughtcrime and questioning the dogma - not denying yet, not even arguing, just thinking about questioning! - you already in serious danger of being ostracized. This is scary as hell.