So one personal anecdote makes you conclude that the point of the article is wrong?
You have to look at the general population, not at individual cases. Why is this so hard for people to understand?
You have to look at the general population, not at individual cases. Why is this so hard for people to understand?
Estrogen should be considered 'teh shock hormone' or 'the cancer hormone', NOT 'the female hormone'. Most doctors aren't trained to think of the steroids in context.