465k patients told to visit doctor to patch critical pacemaker vulnerability
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
This reminds me of the plot of Casino Royal where the villains short the stock of an airline / airplane manufacturer, then attempt to blow up the plane they are showing off to force the stock to sink. That is some questionable ethics, then again the investment firm is called "Muddy Waters" haha.
I wonder if this is more along the line of finding an exposed database in the wild, or tracking down OEM suppliers and buying samples.
It's hard to love people doing this, because they could have disclosed this privately, but I think it _is_ fair to impose a high cost on not ensuring security, and this is one way of doing that.
You have to agree to some ... interesting ... terms of use including not to distribute the link above, but I guess that ship has sailed.
You're free to discover flaws in products and trade ahead of announcing them.
I would have guessed the total number needing a pacemaker at all would be less than this rate (1/500).
In 2009 alone, doctors implanted ~225,000 pacemakers in the US: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21707667
Germany had the highest reported rate of new implants for any country in the study, at almost 1/1000 just in 2009. In the US that would be 300,000 per year just in new devices, and based on the study's aggregate reporting we could guess another 1/3 for replacement devices - 400,000 new devices per year as a high guess.
There's probably better info in the article but I don't have journal access and don't want to spend $6 to get it for this article.
For more precise instructions on how to transfer Bitcoin, visit your local ER.