Cat5 to replace HDMI later next year?
thinq.co.uk
thinq.co.uk
I initially assumed they were just using a protocol over ethernet, but it looks like they have something better worked out.
They don't get into details, but it looks like 10-20Gbps for the video data. The 100 watts of power is twice what can be achieved with Power-over-ethernet.
The visible fly in the ointment is looming confusion over internet ports and AV ports since they use the same connector.[1]
[1] And a thousand curses on the toad at IBM that used identical connectors for keyboards and mice but incompatible protocols. That was probably a 1 million man hour mistake.
If it is just passive power (not switched on based on some protocol interaction) it's going to be fun when people end up plugging this into their laptop's ethernet slot instead of its HD slot.
"Try plugging into one port. If you see sparks and smoke come out, try the other port."
I obviously didn't know how this is supposed to work.
No no no. This new method puts both on the cable simultaneously.
(hyped and hyped a few months ago as the ultimate cable answer to everything, replacing USB, firewire, ethernet, HDMI, SATA, etc.)
I don't think the brittleness is a big issue. Pro a/v techs often use heavy duty cat5 cables with rugged connectors (http://www.amphenol-airlb.com/Rugged.html - this is the best supplier IMHO). Then, making cables just needs a supply of jacks and a crimping tool - neither is expensive, and being able to do field repairs or make additional cables is a lot better than some custom connector that can only be built in a factory. Finally, power and signal on the same cable is a huge win.
In the video world, it's very desirable to be able to quickly feed signal over varying distances in some new location you've never been into before and will only occupy for a few hours. HDMI cables are a pain, like all fiberoptic cables - very expensive, short runs, and they're so delicate that they need lots of structural shielding which makes the cable springy and hard to manage (which usually necessitates an extra pair of hands). Then, monitors and cameras need power, which means either annoying little adapters plus additional heavy power cables, or else heavy battery packs (which cost $$$).
If the component electronics for this standard are affordable and reliable (and I expect they will be, given similar existing products) then the pro video community will be all over this in short order - a breakout box that delivers 12v DC, has audio & video i/o, and hooks onto a belt will be a godsend for many people even if the camera and sound gear doesn't catch up for a few years. 100w is plenty of power for most requirements.
From what I see of the evaluation units (http://www.valens-semi.com/products/5play-evaluation-kit.asp...) the technology should be easily deployable, and 'revolutionary' would not be too strong a word to use in this context.
http://www.amazon.com/RJ45-Black-Strain-Relief-Boots/dp/B000...
http://www.amazon.com/Denon-AKDL1-Dedicated-Link-Cable/dp/B0...
A small sampling: (there are many, many more)
Transmission of music data at rates faster than the
speed of light seemed convenient, until I realized I
was hearing the music before I actually wanted to
play it. Apparently Denon forgot how accustomed most
of us are to unidirectional time and the general laws
of physics.
I can't recommend this cable enough. I bought a set of
four for my home cinema setup, and I haven't regretted
it at all. [...] When I sit down and listen to the
transcendent music they produce, I can feel my pain
just drift away. Sometimes I even play a CD, but that's
not really necessary.[1]: http://www.amazon.com/Tuscan-Whole-Milk-Gallon-128/product-r... [2]: http://www.amazon.com/Uranium-Ore/product-reviews/B000796XXM...
snake oil(775)
ripoff(697)
waste of money(671)
throwing your money away(613)
unconscionable(529)
stupid(502)
pure garbage(440)
immoral(433)
cheat(404)Still can't decide if the ad is for real, but I do recall somewhere in the late 80's an ad for speakers 'designed for CD music only'.
http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/furutech7/powerflux.html
I highly recommend browsing this site to get an understanding of what quality really means. I have met several people who 'get it' and have installed quality products like this: they have all been very happy with the results. *
* which appear to involve competitive shopping as a proxy for income
Here in the UK it already costs £5-10 for a 1.5m cable in our high street stores. Obviously I wouldn't get one from there, but many people do.
A typical example; http://www.pcworld.co.uk/gbuk/belkin-gigabit-ethernet-cable-...
Here: http://xkcdsucks.blogspot.com/2010/04/comic-732-low-quality....
You might want to read what they're claiming they will do before writing it off as "reinventing" basic ethernet.
IT'S HUMOR.
Anyone else see a two-order-of-magnitude problem with that statement? Uh .. if it can only transfer 100Mbps, where does the 10.2Gbps video come from? And why does a predicted 10x increase in the base transport speed only translate to a 2x increase in the high level delivery speed?
And running HDMI over CAT5 is not exactly brand new, either:
http://www.hometheaterblog.com/hometheater/2007/12/honeywell...