The thing that interests me is technical issues of a site nobody wants to host. Deny them DNS, Deny them DDOS protection, Deny them hosting, whats left?
Of course, the other option is to find someone who does want to host you or start your own. They've done decently, bulletproof.al has been willing to provide them domains, bitmitigate is providing their DDoS protection, etc.
As others in this thread have mentioned, there's a tendency for many entrepreneurial types to gravitate towards services that are very much hands-off, BitMitigate and Bulletproof made a name for themselves here and I'll certainly give them a shot if I'm hosting anything where users can post comments or I'm posting things that are remotely controversial. There's value in knowing your site won't go down even if the worst kind of controversy is stirred.
I mean, not being a neo-Nazi is an option...
I think their only option left is tor.
From an Ideals perspective, its a valid and valiant fear, but I don't understand the absolutist position. Legitimate verbal threats are still allowed under absolute free speech, but they obviously produce harm. Should we really allow anyone to threaten the life or livelihood of another human being without repercussion?
Absolutism in the other direction is just as dystopian as well. Follow the exact line of populist opinion or else.
So "Free speech on principal" people, where does it end? What ISN'T "Free Speech" to you?