Do the page "The ZFC Axioms" contain errors? I can't understand the following proposition:
∃y∀z(∃w(z ∈ w ∧ w ∈ x) ⇒ z ∈ y)
Shouldn't it be:
∃y∀z(∃w(z ∈ w ∧ w ∈ y) ⇒ z ∈ y)
∃y∀z(∃w(z ∈ w ∧ w ∈ x) ⇒ z ∈ y)
Shouldn't it be:
∃y∀z(∃w(z ∈ w ∧ w ∈ y) ⇒ z ∈ y)
No comments yet.