Would it have been much more effort for the photographer to take a photo that was scannable? Or is there just too much variance in the arrangement and no reader would actually scan it even without a photo?
Would it have been much more effort for the photographer to take a photo that was scannable? Or is there just too much variance in the arrangement and no reader would actually scan it even without a photo?
http://weixin.qq.com/r/WD-i_pfE3sqhrdOZ92pK
Visiting that link simply forwards me to
http://www.wechat.com/mobile/en/
Rather anticlimactic.
You need to install WeChat and use the app to scan it to go the official account of the tourism office.
Those which can't read the code probably use traditional thresholding to reduce the input into 0-1 first, while those which can are using some variation of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soft-decision_decoding algorithm.
It doesn't help either that the middle was blanked out, eating into the error correction budget.
So did Google Goggles.