My guess on how it will turn out:

1. People given Basic income and minimal addictions will fair best 2. People without basic income and minimal addictions will fair second best 2. People without basic income and addictions will fair third best(drugs, major alcohol, internet/game)

4. People given basic income and addictions will fair worst(drugs, major alcohol, internet/game)

I'm probably completely wrong. 3 and 4 could be switched in which case Basic income would be always better.

My general premise is giving people with a strong addiction money without some kind of life structure is a bad idea.

Please don't down vote me if you disagree. Please just comment on how you disagree.