> Why less? Because there are 9 people waiting to take his job if he quits
This is the answer
This is the answer
Which should then drive an increase in wages. But it hasn't, and economists don't know why - or at least as far as this armchair economist has read ;-)
I agree that U6 and prime age labor force participation rates are both weak, and relevant to worker bargaining power, but to argue that U3 has no basis in reality is absurd.
If I’m looking for labor this month, my pool of applicants will be coming from the U3 pool, people who are actively looking for work.
High U6 unemployment suggests I might do better to raise wages slightly, rather than aggressively, if I urgently need workers.