Hacker News Reader

Your phrasing leads me to believe that you distrust how web standards organizations approve new features? If that's not the case then I invite you to join the W3C Community Group and help avoid insecure additions w3.org/community/webassembly/

View on HN

That doesn’t help, as the browser vendors ignore the W3C entirely anyway, and just do stuff in the WHATWG.

And we already have a bluetooth stack for the web, USB drivers in JS, etc.

That is entirely incorrect for the WebAssembly CG and WG.

The WebAssembly grouo may be different, but in every other group I've seen, the browsers simply didn't care about what everyone else was doing.

To the point that they redefined the URL spec and then complained that cURL didn't fulfill it.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com