That clearly is the assumption of the argument. That women don't have enough opportunities and thus are underrepresented in the work force. Whether that opportunity refers to discrimination, encouragement, etc. is irrelevant to what I'm saying. What if women are underrepresented because they simply don't want the jobs?
In a society where women are not treated equally, you're dodging the real issue to argue about something that's not relevant.
.... what women want isn't relevant?
Vigorously arguing about "what women want" in the face of today's known discrimination against women in tech is not relevant.
Not to mention misrepresenting what "the argument" is about, but I guess you've already moved on from that.
Except we do not live in a society where women are not treated equally.