High costs keeping software startups from filing patents
readwriteweb.com
readwriteweb.com
Patents are not a meaningful part of the arsenal for small tech startups. Watch out. Unscrupulous IP lawyers will try to convince you otherwise.
As you noted there are also concerns about time. It takes years to get the option and then years to exercise it.
Are patents old hat to software startups?
Uh, they were always old hat. No one has ever liked them except for larger companies that can use them to mess up the competition.
This is a disadvantage for startups, because big companies will play this game. And it's a game backed by IP law so you can decide not to file, but you can't opt out.
He's a good guy. I worked with him when he was at Greenberg Traurig and I was at Yahoo.
He is now captain of his own ship without biglaw overhead.
For a startup that can afford it, patents and IP in general can be a good investment.
http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/qs/ope/fee2009september1...
This is for a complex piece of opto-electronics, explaining to the lawyer (who has a physics degree) exactly why this is different to the dozens of similar patents is expensive - but a different bit of wording now can be important when I'm being sued by IBM or Sony in a few years.
The PDF explains how an inventor and lawyer can use something like extreme programming (XP) techniques to complete most of the work of drafting and reviewing a patent application in one sitting.
http://www.ontechnologylaw.com/docs/ToedtOneAndDoneInventorI...
Clearly, in the software space patents are nice but not needed. However, they are the coin of the realm for biotech, clean tech, materials, and many other fields. There's some other papers by faculty at Berkeley (Ted Sichelman) showing that, in many fields, patents are one of the more prominent drivers of series A valuations.
How does a trillion dollars sound?