Hacker News Reader

Comment by hutzlibu | Hacker News Reader

Those are very good arguments you provide ...

It is probably pointless, but to try more arguments, I think the same about you " I find your kind to be subtly destructive and all too common"

The illusionary theory, that every human must be saved at all costs. Only that in reality "by all costs" means very often, that not only one goes down, but also many people around them.

I have seen it too often. And in the end, those persons might indeed still breathe, but more like zombies and not really alive .

Letting go can be less cruel in the bigger picture.

View on HN

Do you actually have experience with counterculture? Primal instincts based around the idea of dominance prevail as often do in any social hierarchy, and the musings about some type of altruistism surrounding suicide by the commenter to whom I replied reflect this reality.

In short, the counterculture movement is plenty infiltrated with immature and often sociopathic mentalities that heartlessly harass sensitive folks who are at their most vulnerable under the influence of psychedelics. This is rarely discussed but is so prevalent, particularly since the age of exposure aligns with immature phases, adolesence in particular.

In laymen’s terms, it’s a sport to “fuck with” someone who has a “reaction”. Perhaps it’s the suicide victim realizing that, instead of this idea that they are a defective burden saving society from their own black hole via premature self termination, that they are escaping unwanted membership of a vastly primitive species. I assure you, the mentality of the suicidal is quite the opposite of “conventional wisdom” about being a burden, at least in some cases.

Dude.

You told me I am imature, because I proposed the theory, that in some(!) cases, it might be better for a suicidal person to just kill himself, instead of everyone around them as well. (I know cases, where persons literally think about the latter, those I referenced)

So what has that to do with psychopaths who take advantage of sensitive persons and possible drive them to death?!?

Not at all related for the sake of the original argument.

But by now I know your type of person well, self-declared enlighted ... high above the " primitive species" below. But unhappy, because the primitive people have the power and therefore drive the enlightened down out of jealously. Yeah, yeah, I know.

Well in that case, what do you think about a very low specimen who is so down, that he hinks about either killing himself, or other's? Save him under all costs and risk him later still killing "enlightened" people? Or accept him choosing to go on his own, now? Why do you care anyway, he's just from a "low species"...

You come across as suggesting to someone they should self-terminate because it's better that way.

In "some" cases I do believe, it is the better way.

Not at all in all cases, nor in your case.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com