They also last for a very long time in a normal fridge.
Why isn't it included in normal vaccination plans? It looks like there is something controlling the supply and we are paying with human lives all over the world.
They also last for a very long time in a normal fridge.
Why isn't it included in normal vaccination plans? It looks like there is something controlling the supply and we are paying with human lives all over the world.
Additionally, hepatitis outbreaks are associated with sanitation problems. Chicken pox, measles, mumps, etc. are associated with putting many people close together, like in a school, so it took a while to add hepatitis to vaccination schedules.
It's also true that many people believe the vaccination wouldn't be necessary if we could just get people to pay attention to sanitation, so there is some opposition along the lines of "if we require this vaccine, we're admitting defeat as far as a clean society is concerned."
"The current version of hepatitis A vaccine", presumably.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hepatitis_A
"After a single infection, a person is immune for the rest of his or her life.[8]"
Therefore it was only given to populations already at risk of infection, e.g. nurses.
The risk was really tiny anyway. Even if you did get infected, it was unlikely to cause any damage.
But going from other comments in the thread it's not the same vaccine that is used today, so I expect they fixed the problem.
I had to argue with my primary care doctor for them. I also had to fight the insurance company for them. The primary care doctor relented after I stated "these vaccines are on the CDC recommended list of vaccines for all healthy adults over the age of X. I do not understand why you are rejecting the idea. It seems contrary to good public health policy." She put in the request uncertain if the insurance company would authorize but I got the first shot so I assumed the troubles were over. Wrong...
Come time to get the 2nd shot of 3 (I think the combined A/B vaccine is a 3 part shot IDK), the care team tells me "we are not sure if we can give you the 2nd shot because the insurance provider rejected the first shot request". Why they didn't tell me right away, no idea. So we danced around for a while, and I finally asked how much the entire series of shots were. They didn't know. Is is $100 or $1000? I tell them if it's $100 I'll just pay for it myself, far cheaper than hospitalization. I guess after some embarrassment on their part, I get the 2nd shot without paying and don't hear about the problems between the doctor office and the insurance company again. I ask before the 3rd shot if the issues got cleared and I heard nothing. Haven't been billed either so I am assuming all is well.
Sooooooo.... while homeless population increases, publicly accessible toilets and sinks disappear, plastic shopping bags are outlawed, my by experience doctors and insurance companies have been dissuading people from getting vaccine protections. We are surprised a dirty unsanitary society with a shitty healthcare system has disease outbreaks? I am not, not at all. It's why I fought so hard for the vaccinations. I would get the a HEPc vaccine if there was one available.
Why shouldn't USA--as in the FedGov--make such vaccines 100% free for everyone, a child or a 55 year old? An ounce of prevention and all....maybe subsidize them, pay cost only.
Personally I went to a private clinic and paid for them, but it was hundreds and hundreds. Not everyone can afford them and when you 80 million (or whatever) vaccines, the price can come down.
Health and preventing health issues is not the responsibility of the government, but individual.
Sure, says who? USA takes "26 percent of gross domestic product" in taxes http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/briefing-book/how-do-us-taxes... , so the govt can't just take. And USA pays for liver transplants, disability and loss in productivity.
Not to mention that US made healthcare its business with Obamacare.
>>Immigrants that come into the country (legally) are required by law to have received or receive vaccinations listed by the gov't.
For $10 the Sudan (++++) authorities will give you any vaccination record the US Embassy requires
Sudan has recently experienced 15 deaths due to a botched vaccination. In countries like Sudan, workers may not be properly trained, there are less legal protections, and doctors are much more time-resource bound, leading to rushed care.
The largest chunk of uninsured, based on a study by the Kaiser Family Foundation, are "undocumented immigrants" with an estimated 5.4 million uninsured. The remainder of those who aren't able to obtain health insurance (not to be confused with health care, which any individual can obtain by going into an emergency room or free health clinic) have either a coverage gap (2.6 million) or their income is too high to obtain a subsidy (3.0 million).
Say someone experiences an adverse reaction to a vaccine (which does happen) and wants to sue the hospital; no questions asked means that the medical provider did not do a proper assessment of the patient, leaving that professional legally liable to damages.
The issue is that doing so will put millions in the insurance industry out of work. It becomes more than a public health issue, and very much so that looks to eliminate a industry that has wide power to retaliate through various strategies.
Not to mention, single payer is a quite resource intensive strategy that will require extensive capital to start versus spending now for more coverage through a program.
Because of this, single payer may never come to America through federal means.
Price fixing a vaccine, versus subsidizing it, would affect thousands of private businesses and spur a flurry of changes across the health care industry, first and foremost would strike anxiety into the market, driving up prices. Resources become inefficiently allocated for the vaccine because of legal requirements, instead of pressing patient needs.
I see many people who want healthcare fixed via government monopolization, but it is my best belief that healthcare stays private, with various government subsidies, especially post-investigation of the VA scandal by the Obama administration.
Private (non-profit) healthcare has more incentive to fight fraud, specialize in pathologies, appropriately allocate resources, and most importantly, provide excellent, aboveboard care.
The idea that the government would provide 100% coverage of vaccines without fixing prices is one that people are free to argue, meanwhile I will gesticulate wildly in the direction of Medicaid.
https://www.kff.org/slideshow/public-opinion-on-prescription...
Wait, this makes it sound fool-proof. I know it's supposed to do this, but how successful is this vaccine at actually doing this for __% of the population?