Sure, but the probability we're hallucinating goes down quite a bit when all (or most) of our 5+ senses agree that a thing is really there and happening. If it weren't we wouldn't have lasted long in the real world.
Hallucinations are the addition of something which isn’t there, we work more by heavy filtering. We see a narrow slice of EM radiation, what we see is at best, only part of what is real. That doesn’t imply magic, but it does about the incompleteness of our senses.
There's also distortions that can mess up our evaluations of the world. We've got some majorly flawed equipment, but it still seems to work just enough so enough of us can reproduce.
That presupposes what it's supposed to prove.
Let's minimize the loss
Argument from redundancy? Nice.
statistics provides that tool, so it’s an argument from math
Statistics don't come with premises we don't put in them.