Cancer is increasing at an alarming rate - could be from many many factors but worth understanding more before just allowing wide scale deployment.
I'd rather live with 4G versus 5G and cancer...
Cancer is increasing at an alarming rate - could be from many many factors but worth understanding more before just allowing wide scale deployment.
I'd rather live with 4G versus 5G and cancer...
https://brain-cancer.canceraustralia.gov.au/sites/default/fi...
Claims like that would really benefit from a link to the specific study you're talking about.
https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/results/areas/cellphones/
The American Cancer Society called it a "paradigm shift" in our understanding of the effects of non-ionizing radiation, FWIW.
In fact, if you look at the various studied rat groups, and take the reported results at face value, you would note that the male rats exposed to the most cell phone radiation had the longest lifespan, greater than the controls (which had curiously low survival rates compared to the norm in lab rats too, btw, further muddying the findings).
Not a junky study exactly, but the analysis of the data is problematic.
It does paint a pretty direct link, even if the results have been rushed.