But your examples aren't 'facts', they're 'opinions'. Unless we're going to just throw away the definition of 'fact', we shouldn't be pretending that those example claims can possible be 'fact'.
Exactly.
> we shouldn't be pretending that those example claims can possible be 'fact'.
We shouldn't. But "we" do all the time. Slapping API and UI with Google logo on it won't change that. But it would let people pretend that now these are "facts" - after all, the source of all knowledge in the universe, Almighty Google says right here "fact check"! How's that not a fact?!