Why not both?
If she were a dude with an unfitted black tee, it seems a lot less likely that she'd be accused of being 'fake'.
If she were a dude with an unfitted black tee, it seems a lot less likely that she'd be accused of being 'fake'.
I agree that there's probably an unpleasant subtext behind this guy's decision to wreck Naomi Wu's career. All I'm saying is, we don't have to reach that issue to see how reckless what he did was.
Context: https://medium.com/@kelas/how-is-tj-holowaychuk-so-insanely-...
Do you mean the accusation that someone is playing a role for marketing purposes, and is not actually like the image portrayed? Why is that such an inconceivable accusation? Why should nobody have to defend herself against that?
That's an odd argument. Why would someone manufacture a schlubby geek persona? Seems like attractiveness and distinctiveness are key qualities in a (hypothetical) persona.